Earlier we had alerted to a change in sheet design adopted for the Buckingham Covers Royal Flying Corps stamp sheet issued recently. Here is the pre-issued artwork and the as-issued image.
I recently received a letter from Buckingham Covers asking me to
return the Commemorative Cover issued by them for this issue as they had inadvertently
failed to add a King George V 2d stamp and cachet that had been included in the
pre-issue artwork for this cover.
As I was preparing to return it as requested I noticed a strange
thing. The Smilers and stamp and label affixed to the cover was not a Smilers
stamp as advertised but a privately produced label affixed alongside a Union
Flag stamp to look like a Smilers stamp/label. To say I was surprised
would be an understatement.
So I wrote to Tony Buckingham and asked him how
why they had changed the stamp design, why they had chosen to use a privately
produced label in lieu of a Smilers stamp and label and whether they had ever
done anything similar before, because the cover is still being advertised
as follows:
Our cover commemorates the centenary of the
formation of The Royal Flying Corps. It features a stamp and label from our
sheet and is postmarked on 13th May 2012. It also features a two pence stamp and
cachet.
I received a reply from one of Tony's employee's
as follows:
I hope that answers your question and apologies that you have been disappointed on this occasion.
Whilst Buckingham have side-stepped the questions
of why the change in stamp design and whether this has ever happened before (I
am still pursuing these so hopefully I can update you on their response later
this month), I can not accept that this was a credible
response to this problem. They completely ignored the personalised Smilers
service which for the price of five personalised stamp sheets would have netted
them 100 stamps/labels for their cover production run.
What do you think?
Personally I was quite shocked that a reputable company
such as Buckingham Covers could take such actions without telling their
customers and their response left a number of questions unanswered. But
perhaps it is just me feeling somewhat "sold short" on this cover (I
have since returned it for a full refund). I would like to hear what you think
so I have posted this article on the Smilers Blog and encourage you to have your
say so that appropriate feedback can be given directly to Smilers cover
producers in general. If we do not reject such practices the next step will be
home produced Smilers labels and stamps!!.
Interesting also that they used the Union Flag stamp on the cover when the sheet as issued had the Royal Seal stamp - wrong on both counts! Absolutely shocking from a supposed top philatelic producer.
ReplyDeleteThis is misrepresentation, plain and simple. But I would expect Buckingham Covers to fess up and take back the covers and refund any postage if requested to do so.
ReplyDeleteTYPICAL OF THE SHARP PRACTISE THAT SEEMS TO BE CARRIED OUT BY MOST OF THE TOP PRODUCERS
ReplyDelete